On Social Constructions ( 1 )

On Social Constructions ( 1 )

“ Society has yet to find a Term by which it can Convene upon a Contemplation ( far Less Actual Affinity) of a Manner of a Person whose individuality is neither consistent with the confabulations of Society, nor inconsistent with the morals and methods innate to Correct Action of Such a Person’s privy personhood in relation to “other” personalities, events, palates, and phenomena of the Senses involving Seeing, Tasting, Touching, Listening, and Smelling – which are in effect emanations of that Person’s Internal and External recognized as well as gradually more regonizable activities. Society can not placate nor put a placeholder on the destiny of a Soul to whom Harmony is Known by Branches of Comprehensions precipitated and withdrawn along the veins of Appreciation of the Virtues alone, while darkening qualities are interpreted in transparency and with accordance and guilessly defined in its implicit Principles and made Known by its occasional renderings through Social Construct of Time and Space, as fashionable and lasting interpretations of Sub-Divisions of an inner Composite, that is given in traditions of architectures, and medicinal thought syntaxes as well as Music, that for the unaware and vague Organism of Society at large, yet in time ( and beyond it ) attain more than just Mental or mere Bodily pleasures for the Society Man whose eyes one day opens when he is ready and mature enough to Perceive of his own Freewill, the great works left by the traditions of persons ranging from Beethoven to Gautama Buddha, Jesus A Christ to Johann Pachelbel. Truly, Society in the vanity of the ages, in its own Contract, has not found any instinct in itself ready to grant acceptance to a person who being in possession of discernment can comprehend and solicit realization in his own mind by the effects of honest meditations which dispel darkness of dogma and the unreal, grant assent in his character which dispel any immaturity or profligacy or debt of nature, overcomes the hysterical bents upon truth caused by the passions of those of distant as well as contemporary, - a Person brave enough first to Overcome himself or herself, and thus, realize in the Social Organism an emancipation of a Proclaimed Potentiality which is Forever fixed in the wax and wane of mundane human labors, as a Possibility, never again to be refuted, other than by the willful ignorance of the Social Organism. Beyond, historicity, the Creation and Opportune Realization of a Person who wishes nothing False, and more than mere wishing, permits in his own nature nothing false, makes it possible for a drunken Social Organism to have Eyes to See and Ears to Discern. Without such a Person in Society, one day such a Person As Society, the whole manufacture of the so-called “Human Race” will become one great and atrocious fallibility. To allow it, whether by the apathy and gloom of the Individual, or by the Composite consistency of a Society so shallow as to be consumed by its own shadow, is to deposit a supreme degree of Ingratitude to the Creation of Life itself.” ( Alexander K. RAI MSMA )

. . .