On Mutual Admiration [ 4 ]

If in a System of Mutual Admiration, one friend is wrong, then the other friend is also wrong. This is Natural Science. Just as Absolute Truth does not endure in Relative Format, the Relativism Innate in a System of Mutual Admiration, cannot Grace itself as Complete Truth, far less a Truth so complete and without contradiction, that the Admirer is Right and the Admired is Wrong. That is Nonsense. There has never been, in all of the ages, a Reality of Absolute Truth in a mundane world of relativism, to the extent as may be applicable to its participants, “Sinners” or “Saints”. The Relevant and the Absolute, of course exist in Luminous and Balanced Communion with the Natural and Unmanufactured Sensitivities of the Golden Ratio vested in the Proximal Spheres of the Mutual Admiration. Yet, the subtle developments always require and appreciate and honor imperfection, and imperfection can only be achieved and honored by a consistent conformity to One’s Own Nature, - which like all of Nature, is essentially Less perfect than the Origin of all Phenomenal Nature : ‘The Source’, which in its Absolute Pervasiveness as “The Living God” – is of course, “Perfect”, and an Absolute Realization of its Nature within the Admired or the Admirer, would quickly cause either one “Death”. Those that seek such “Death” symbolically activate the themselves as “monks” – or “sages” – and that is why traditionally such persons, Abstain from “Mutual” admiration, from Social Contract, and exercise fastidiously a dogmatic “Dead to the World” symbolizing their Desire to Depart from these Spheres to “those” Spheres. . . So, all this to say, in a Mutual Admiration Relatedness, Error is Mutual, and Rightness of Action is simultaneously Mutual. Is it not True that the Tao says, “Things that are Strictly True seem Paradoxical?” It follows, that Mutual Admiration is Paradoxical. Anyone who realizes “Why” it is Paradoxical, would quickly discover the folly rooted at the very depth of that Line of Inquiry. “Why” is Finite and implies a Finite State and Linearity. “How” can only be Experienced and Subtly Realized in degrees, by turns, and gentlest impressions. A Member to A Society of Mutual Admiration appreciates the heavenly conundrum-non-conundrum, and Knows how to Cherish and Keep It Pristine in the Protective Sleeves of the Virtues, governed in my opinion, by Three Cardinal Virtue-Governors in the Interior Consciousness : ‘[Highest]Honesty’, ‘[Deep] Appreciation’, ‘[Constancy Of ]Commitment’.

. . .