On Language ( Sentence Structure ) [ 1 ]

On Language ( Sentence Structure ) [ 1 ]

People, time to time, ask me why my sentence structure has to be so complicated. That is, - perhaps - what I can infer from their remark Objectively as what appears to be an Inquiry of my Methods – without any further “ad hominem” reference to their Persona – purely by focusing unemotionally on their statement as given as an Inferential Whole I can only succeed in surmising the following : (1) ‘Why’ the Semi Colon plays such an overwhelming role in dealing with the sub-division of so many numerous sentences, (2) ‘Why’ the sentences are Long and not Short, (3) ‘Why’ those Long rather than short sentences, yet constitute in them, expressions arcane in the contemporary vocabulary medium, - Or (4) ‘Why’ – such an Intensity of Expression has to be all too woefully “accommodated by” and “processed in” the Mind of the Reader, who yet, himself, is so busily occupied in Criticizing the “Woe Begotten State of Tabloid News and Television Carnival” with a Daily Dose of Relish and Antagonism. Of course, People that state, “Why my sentence structure has to be so complicated”, I find neither Seeking to Ask such genuses of ‘Why’ nor Capable of Imagining an Objective frame of mind by which they could be made Responsible for what they State or do not State, Ask and Do Not Ask, Criticize and Do Not Criticize. Nothing in their way of making that statement – when Subjectively entertained – by their ways of asking it – in connection with their facial grimaces, their Spiritual Irritability, their twitches and discomforts and pouts - remotely suggest even a genuine Spirit of Inquiry in a remark that seeks to “Thrive” in its own Self-Satisfaction structured in the manner : “Why does your sentence structure has to be so complicated!”

This Experience alone, never mind “Why” my Sentence structures have to be “Complicated”, - has Greatly Simplified, Distilled, and Clarified “Why” I, as a Person and as an American, have in past experienced such a profound lack of Faith in the Religion of “Customer Service”, Concrete paved “Success Addresses” in “Suburbia”, disenchantment with so called “Music Labels” termed “Fat Boy Slim”, - and an Enforced Scholastic Secular Theocracy dictated by the protocols of money shuffling Sicilians of the Mafia Era 5.0 , that likes to regard itself so omnipotent and Universal in its relation to the Potential of American Youth, that it believes itself to actually “Know” and “Comprehend”, a thing or two about “What”, “Why”, “Where”, “When”, and “Who” constitutes Language – even something as recent – as “The English Language” – by the virtue of promoting a curriculum of so called “Education”, which installs girls and guys who were only Five years ago, harlots and pimps in so-called “Universities”, drinking booze and living the life of libertines, - who with the voodoo program of a “Certified Scrap of Paper”, with a “Major in English”, and a “Minor in Sociology”, proceed to Indoctrinate, 13 and 15 year olds – playing the nouveau roles of “English Teachers” and “School Mistresses”, - performing Levi Jeans and Tommy Hilfiger Rituals before “Awe Inspired” , “All Boggled”, Half Drooling, and “Emancipated” children, who learn more about “How to Get (a)head” than the Contents and Qualities of What is and is not in their Physiological Heads. So Then, the perturbations that such persons experience from my “Sentence Structures”, can not be merely Quantified in Objectivity of Serene “Why’s” – but rather – has to be Qualitatively understood ( And also patiently endured and overcome ) in Subjectivity, as “What” – as In – “What On Earth have you been Smoking!” – a Syntactical State of Mind, conducive to appreciating Simpler truths, both structured and unstructured in the collective delusion, that some still imagine to be an Equal to “Living”, as their painted, dreary, and sardonic curricula vita continues to document semen stains on half broken couches in dormitories, booze stains and ketchup stains on half washed jeans and polo shirts, protein shake breath comingling with ethanol, - as Evidences of “What” Constitutes a “Suburban Success Address” – And “Why”.
( Alexander K RAI MSMA )






. . .